Elon Musk and X Corp. — the Musk-backed dad or mum firm of social media platform Twitter — face an investigation over constructing code violations at Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters on Market Avenue, based on on-line public information with the county’s Division of Constructing Inspection.

The probe, which was beforehand reported by the San Francisco Chronicle, follows a lawsuit filed Could 16 in Delaware court docket by six former Twitter staff, who allege Musk’s “transition staff” knowingly and repeatedly ordered them to interrupt native and federal legal guidelines, together with by making unsafe modifications to the corporate’s workplace house.

The lawsuit alleges below Musk’s administration, X Corp. directed staff to show rooms within the San Francisco headquarters workplace into “lodge rooms,” whereas mendacity to inspectors and their landlord they had been simply “non permanent relaxation areas” with some snug furnishings added and no substantive or structural adjustments.

The lawsuit says one worker was informed to position locks on the unauthorized “lodge room” doorways that didn’t meet a California code which “requires locks that routinely disengage when the constructing’s fireplace suppression programs are triggered.”

The ex-Twitter worker stated within the criticism Musk’s transition staff repeatedly informed them “compliant locks had been too costly” and instructed them as a substitute to “instantly set up cheaper locks that weren’t compliant with life security and egress codes.”

The worker stop moderately than break that regulation, their attorneys famous within the lawsuit.

The criticism additionally alleges Musk-led Twitter didn’t pay the staff severance, again pay and advantages they had been owed, and discriminated in opposition to some senior staff on the premise of age, gender and sexual orientation when it determined to terminate them.

Moreover, the lawsuit stated Musk and members of his transition staff, specifically Boring Firm government Steve Davis, ordered staff concerned within the administration of actual property to slash prices by $500 million as shortly as they might. Within the drive to chop prices, the Musk transition staff informed staff to easily refuse to pay landlords who had been owed hire by the corporate.

When knowledgeable of the dangers of termination charges for sure leases, Davis informed Twitter senior staff, “Properly, we simply will not pay these. We simply will not pay landlords,” including, “we simply will not pay hire,” the criticism says.

In the meantime, Miami Mayor Francis Suarez is actively courting Musk to maneuver Twitter headquarters to his jurisdiction. On Friday, he wrote on Twitter, “let’s get them to MIA asap.”

CNBC reached out to Twitter for additional info and the corporate responded with an automatic response that included a poop emoji however no remark.

A consultant for the Division of Constructing Inspection in San Francisco stated in an emailed assertion that the criticism was opened Friday morning and “no additional motion has been taken but.”

“We count on to succeed in out to constructing administration quickly,” the spokesperson wrote. “We’re not speculating on future potential enforcement motion.”

Learn the lawsuit right here.