Leaders of the G7 collect in Japan this weekend amid international fears of a US debt default, deepening division over vitality coverage and no finish in sight for the conflict in Ukraine.

However for Japanese prime minister Fumio Kishida, the highest problem for the annual summit of superior economies might be whether or not it may possibly undertaking a unified G7 response to China’s navy ambitions and its use of “financial coercion” as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen described it final week.

Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Kishida has tried to align with G7 counterparts within the US, UK, France, Italy, Germany and Canada by rolling out robust sanctions towards Moscow and forging nearer ties with the Nato alliance. He has additionally accepted a big improve in Japan’s navy spending to counter the risk from China.

When he hosts the summit in his household’s dwelling metropolis of Hiroshima, Kishida — who has repeatedly warned that “Ukraine could be east Asia tomorrow” — will need equally sturdy help from Europe over how the G7 ought to deal with China and the danger of a battle over Taiwan.

“It’s essential for the G7 to substantiate that any unilateral try to alter the established order by power or coercion is unacceptable in any a part of the world,” Kishida mentioned final month. “I imagine it will result in a unified response by the worldwide group when one thing much like Ukraine occurs exterior of Europe.”

The problem has been divisive for the west. French president Emmanuel Macron sparked a world outcry final month when he warned throughout a visit to China that Europe shouldn’t get “caught up in crises that aren’t ours”.

“The G7 rose to the second within the Ukraine disaster . . . However the Indo-Pacific presents its personal challenges within the aftermath of Macron’s feedback,” mentioned Mireya Solís, a Japan professional on the Brookings Establishment. “Tokyo wish to see a powerful assertion that the grouping of democracies stands aligned within the face of the China problem.”

The US can be pushing for as united a entrance as doable. President Joe Biden’s administration has began emphasising that its China coverage is concentrated on “de-risking” and never “decoupling”. US officers adopted the phrase from European Fee president Ursula von der Leyen in an effort to reassure G7 allies the US was not pushing for a extra draconian method to Beijing.

An enormous focus of the Hiroshima summit might be how far the member international locations can define a concerted response to Beijing’s raids of overseas corporations and detention of company executives.

The G7 plans to challenge for the primary time a separate assertion on financial safety alongside the principle summit communiqué. The assertion will embody a dedication to “collectively deter, reply to and counter financial coercion”, in line with paperwork seen by the Monetary Occasions.

Individuals acquainted with the discussions say, nevertheless, that China is not going to be named within the assertion and the G7 is unlikely to achieve an settlement on particular new financial safety instruments past co-operation on provide chains to cut back their reliance on China.

China has argued that it’s “the sufferer of US financial coercion” moderately than a perpetrator, saying Washington has overstretched the idea of nationwide safety and “abused” using export controls.

“If the G7 summit is to debate response to financial coercion, maybe it ought to first focus on what the US has finished,” Chinese language overseas ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin mentioned on Friday. “Because the G7 host, would Japan categorical a few of these issues to the US on behalf of the remainder of the group who’ve been bullied by the US? Or no less than converse a number of phrases of the reality?”

The US final yr launched sweeping export controls that might severely complicate efforts by Chinese language corporations to develop cutting-edge applied sciences with navy purposes. Washington is now searching for the help of its allies because it finalises a brand new outbound investment-screening mechanism aimed toward China.

“It’s doable to achieve an settlement that financial safety is necessary, however there may be nonetheless a big hole between the US, EU and Japan in relation to rolling out offensive measures comparable to export controls,” mentioned Kazuto Suzuki, professor on the College of Tokyo. In March, Japan unveiled curbs on the export of 23 totally different sorts of expertise as a part of a deal reached with the US and the Netherlands, however officers in Tokyo have harassed the measures should not focused towards a single nation.

Deep financial ties to China additionally make the EU reluctant to observe Washington’s hardline method. European capitals concern a return to a Chilly Battle scenario, with China rather than the USSR, leaving Europe at greatest a US satellite tv for pc and at worst a battleground between the 2.

European officers have harassed that the G7 ought to improve outreach to different international locations, notably growing economies in Asia, Africa and South America. “[Our] goal is to not rework the G7 into an anti-China membership,” mentioned a senior EU official concerned in G7 preparation.

The G7 has invited the leaders of non-member nations comparable to India, Indonesia, Brazil and Vietnam to the Hiroshima summit.

“We wish to strengthen G7’s outreach to worldwide companions by means of . . . requires co-operation in addressing the challenges going through the worldwide group . . . comparable to vitality and meals safety, local weather change, well being and improvement,” Yoshimasa Hayashi, Japan’s overseas minister, mentioned in a written interview with the Monetary Occasions. “We wish to affirm G7’s unity in these regards.”

These feedback come even because the G7 stays divided on vitality coverage, together with Japan’s promotion of ammonia as a low-carbon vitality supply and Germany’s push for G7 endorsement of public funding within the fuel sector.

Christopher Johnstone, Japan chair at US think-tank CSIS, mentioned Tokyo was nonetheless eager to have interaction with non-G7 international locations as a result of Russia’s membership of the G20 had fractured that broader grouping.

“Tokyo is worried that has opened the door to expanded Chinese language affect throughout the growing world, the place criticism of western hypocrisy finds resonance,” Johnstone mentioned. “Kishida is making an attempt to mitigate the very fact by bringing extra voices to the desk on the G7.”