Breaking News & Top Stories


The pressure on banks is very different from 2008

It’s “unlikely” that European banks will bear something as critical as in 2008, in accordance with economists.

Peter Macdiarmid / Employees / Getty Photographs

LONDON Turbulence throughout the banking sector has prompted the query of whether or not we’re teetering on the sting of one other monetary crash, 2008-style. However a banking disaster right now would look very totally different from 15 years in the past due to social media, on-line banking, and large shifts in regulation.

That is “the primary financial institution disaster of the Twitter technology,” Paul Donovan, chief economist at UBS International Wealth Administration, advised CNBC earlier this month, in reference to the collapse of Credit score Suisse.

associated investing information


Shares of Credit score Suisse dropped on March 14 after “materials weaknesses” have been present in its monetary reporting. The information began a tumultuous 5 days for the lender, which culminated in rival Swiss financial institution UBS agreeing to take over the beleaguered agency.

“What social media has executed is enhance the significance of popularity, maybe exponentially, and that is a part of this downside I feel,” Donavan added.

Social media provides “extra scope for damaging rumours to unfold” in comparison with 2008, Jon Danielsson, director of the Systemic Danger Centre on the London College of Economics, advised CNBC in an e mail.

“The elevated use of the Web and social media, digital banking and the like, all work to make the monetary system extra fragile than it in any other case can be,” Danielsson stated.

Social media not solely permits rumors to unfold extra simply, but in addition a lot sooner.

“It is a full gamechanger,” Jane Fraser, Citi CEO, stated at an occasion hosted by The Financial Membership of Washington, D.C., final week.

“There are a few tweets after which this factor [the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank] went down a lot sooner than has occurred in historical past,” Fraser added.

This is the first banking crisis of the Twitter era, economist says

Regulators shuttered Silicon Valley Financial institution on March 10 in what was the largest U.S. financial institution collapse for the reason that international monetary disaster in 2008.

Whereas data can unfold inside seconds, cash can now be withdrawn simply as shortly. Cell banking has modified the basic conduct of financial institution customers, in addition to the optics of a monetary collapse.

“There have been no queues exterior banks in the way in which there have been with Northern Rock within the U.Ok. again in [the financial crisis] — that did not occur this time — since you simply go browsing and click on a few buttons and off you go,” Paul Donavan advised CNBC. 

This mix of fast data dissemination and entry to funds could make banks extra susceptible, in accordance with Stefan Legge, head of tax and commerce coverage on the College of St. Gallen’s IFF Institute for Monetary Research.

“Whereas again within the day, the view of individuals lining up in entrance of financial institution branches prompted panic, right now we’ve social media … In a manner, financial institution runs can occur a lot sooner right now,” Legge advised CNBC in an e mail.

Stronger stability sheets

The European Union made large efforts to shore up the zone’s financial state of affairs within the aftermath of the monetary disaster, together with the founding of latest monetary oversight establishments and implementing stress testing to attempt to foresee any tough situations and stop market meltdown.

Danger within the banking system right now is considerably lower than it has been at any time during the last 20 or 30 years.

Bob Parker

Senior Advisor at Worldwide Capital Markets Affiliation

This makes it “unlikely” that European banks will bear something as critical as in 2008, Danielsson advised CNBC. 

“[Bank] funding is extra secure, the regulators are way more attuned to the hazards and the capital ranges are greater,” Danielsson stated.

Strategist: I don't buy the argument that we have major systemic risks building in banking system

At this time banks are anticipated to have way more capital as a buffer, and a superb metric for measuring the distinction between right now’s monetary state of affairs and 2008 is financial institution leverage ratios, Bob Parker, senior advisor at Worldwide Capital Markets Affiliation, advised CNBC’s “Squawk Field Europe” final week.

“When you truly have a look at the highest 30 or 40 international banks … leverage is low, liquidity is excessive. Danger within the banking system right now is considerably lower than it has been at any time during the last 20 or 30 years,” Parker stated.

The European Banking Authority, which was based in 2011 in response to the monetary disaster as a part of the European System of Monetary Supervision, highlighted this in an announcement in regards to the Swiss authorities stepping in to assist Credit score Suisse.

“The European banking sector is resilient, with sturdy ranges of capital and liquidity,” the assertion stated.

Problematic pockets throughout the sector

Particular person gamers can nonetheless run into difficulties nonetheless, regardless of how resilient the sector is as an entire. 

Parker described this as “pockets of fairly critical issues” relatively than points which might be ingrained throughout the whole trade.

“I truly do not buy the argument that we’ve main systemic threat increase within the banking system,” he advised CNBC.

Fraser made comparable observations when evaluating the present banking system with what occurred in 2008. 

“This is not prefer it was final time, this isn’t a credit score disaster,” Fraser stated. “This can be a state of affairs the place it is a number of banks which have some issues, and it is higher to verify we nip that within the bud.”

Belief is essential

One parallel between the 2008 disaster and the present monetary scene is the significance of confidence, with “an absence of belief” having performed an enormous half within the latest European banking turmoil, in accordance with Thomas Jordan, chairman of the Swiss Nationwide Financial institution.

“I don’t imagine that [mobile banking] was the supply of the issue. I feel it was an absence of belief, of confidence in several banks, and that then contributed to this example,” Jordan stated at a press convention Thursday.

If belief is misplaced, then something can occur.

Stefano Ramelli

Assistant professor in company finance on the College of St. Gallen

Whilst banks have enhanced their capital and liquidity positions, and improved regulation and supervision, “failures and insecurity” can nonetheless happen, José Manuel Campa, the chairperson of the European Banking Authority, stated final week.

“We have to stay vigilant and never be complacent,” Campa advised the European Parliament throughout a dialogue on the collapse of Silicon Valley Financial institution.

Belief and confidence within the system is a “elementary regulation of finance,” in accordance with Stefano Ramelli, assistant professor in company finance on the College of St. Gallen.

“Crucial capital for banks is the belief of depositors and traders. If belief is misplaced, then something can occur,” Ramelli stated.